Offensive Signature Line

[Edson!]

But if you try sometimes you just might find you get what you need.

Be thankful it ended there. I was going to report this site to the Obama site that collects falsehoods/rumors about health care reform. I'm not joking.

LOL, now that is hilarious. True to form reese, true to form. BHO's already gotten some of mine. lol He and his admin have got enough of their own "misrepresentations" and falsehoods to deal with.
Guess what? He's not bigger than God. No one is.



About the O.B.A.M.A. thing, well. . .

Fine. Let's just hope that it goes both ways, b/c honestly, in the past it hasn't always.

Personally the O.B.A.M.A. is a silly thing to get bothered about. It's not as though people were calling some racists or alien-haters, as THEY CLEARLY and egregiously DID here.

(And exactly why is someone saying here that Kanye West's comment--'Bush hating black people' is stated here as true, somehow NOT considered offense-worthy?????) I mean personally, I think W's a big boy and can handle himself, just like BHO's a big boy and can handle himself.

But to be fair, that other stuff was taken down. There's stuff of mine that I think was taken down, and no clue why--in fact, lol, I don't even remember what now, so I"m not sure about that. I 'm not going to take time looking for it. So. . .

Thank you pammer for balance.


Michael, Listen, Noodle is a decent and reasonable person. He differs. So what? He knows that he's not the moderator here. So why the need to threaten him? Come on Michael. Time to break open a bottle of Italian red wine. So he dissented to the take down. So what? It didn't change the fact that you did it. Right? So peace and a toast w/ some chianti, cause I'm fresh out of Merlot.

I may be a little closer to getting to Italy, and I just found out that a relative has a villa there. Have to ask again exactly where though.

Ciao!

[reesern1963]

" I respectfully disagree" would have been a way of dissenting. Putting up another acronym implying that it stands for something equally offensive to the previous, just to tweak the noses of the moderating staff--that violates TOS.

You don't get it, do you? You do have limits here. You do not have the right to say whatever you want. You were on a long leash for quite a while. You should have appreciated that.

Noodle should be glad he's even allowed to be here, considering the past history. His disregard for other members and for the TOS of the board show that he thinks about one person only--Noodle.

[Edson!]

Please, when there is true balance and maturity from your end, please speak to me. Until then. . .cheers!

And don't bring that crap up, b/c it had it's own intrinsic imbalance, and I am sure if people care, they can think that through.

The truth seems to be that you think you own this site.

I admit I post here by way of NS's good graces. Believe it or not, I do get that.

I'm not playing he said/she said junk with you. You like it too much, and that is part of the problem.

Now where did I put the nosh to go with my wine?

[michaelp]

Whatever you say.

BTW, I'm not a fan of being threatened.
___________________________
M.I.C.H.A.E.L.

I'm sure. Most bullies don't like it when a bigger kid comes along and takes away their ball.

[michaelp]

If only it weren't for the simple fact that the only reason I get categorized that way is because of my politics.

What puts you on my bad side is your sniping.

[michaelp]

Except I never initiate such behavior...definitely not in the literal sense.

It's like saying I never throw the first punch, yet find yourself fighting all the time. Why is that, you might ask?

Confed...remove the ...

Apparently it changes the meaning.

And don't use his middle name, either. It might be offensive to some and require removal.

From...a poster who voted for a man who was constantly referred to as "the Shrub" and variations of "chimpy."

Exhibit A (first post in thread): sniping.

Crystal ball says you demand to debate the meaning of sniping next.... or pull the "Who me?" card...

Either way, a favorite quote comes to mind when I am talking to you.... "Fighting with you is like fighting with a pig in mud. After some time one realizes that they are covered in mud but the pig is actually enjoying it...."

[michaelp]

It's because you constantly allow juvenile behavior to be directed at me.

Constantly.

This thread isn't about how you are treated on this site; but you've managed to make it about you.

Acronyms are political viewpoints now.

Alrighty then.
________________________
P.E.L.O.S.I.

Exhibit B.

[Edson!]

Wow.

*sigh*

[michaelp]

Pig reference noted. I've never even remotely stooped that low.

I doubt you took that much offense; pretty good chance you got the meaning without taking it personally.

[michaelp]

Generally speaking I get maybe 5 minutes a day to check on the forums; unless you bring something to my attention, I probably wont see it (I did not see the dip wad post).

I only took action on the signature because I received a complaint about it (and it's posted here).

[reesern1963]

Fair enough.

It would definitely be unreasonable to expect you to see everything, but I'd like to point out two things before I head out for the evening.

1. The people who complained about Confed's acronym somehow never thought to complain about the person who called Confed a dipwad. I find that hypocritical.

2. The reason I don't point out things like the "dipwad" item is because I find that any private message I submit is ignored, and because I think it might be feasible for people to use that language...provided they are willing to take it in return...which currently is neither the case nor practice.

It's turned into a one-way street.

I hope that clarifies the issue a bit.

Had I seen it, I might have complained about it. It's offensive.

It shows how poor some people's critical reading skills are. I didn't call anyone wolverines. I said they behaved like wolverines. Big difference, which I had a feeling would be lost on 97% and would eventually result in someone complaining and getting the post edited. I don't really care if it got edited out. No skin off my back.

You were whining, Noodle, even when I wasn't posting here. You just focused on the few people who stood up to you. Somehow, you always seem to feel persecuted, even when the floor is nearly yours alone.

[Edson!]

Had I seen it, I might have complained about it. It's offensive.

It shows how poor some people's critical reading skills are. I didn't call anyone wolverines. I said they behaved like wolverines. Big difference, which I had a feeling would be lost on 97% and would eventually result in someone complaining and getting the post edited. I don't really care if it got edited out. No skin off my back.

You were whining, Noodle, even when I wasn't posting here. You just focused on the few people who stood up to you. Somehow, you always seem to feel persecuted, even when the floor is nearly yours alone.

"Somehow, you always seem to feel persecuted, even when the floor is nearly yours alone."

shhhhhhh. Now is the time for a silent, reverent moment. . . . . .


OK. Now to the above I state unequivocally, though it will fall on deadened ears for one or more.

P R O J E C T I O N!


Thus your whining and false claims of "stalking."


Clear Projection.

You won't receive it, but you need to have it stated none the less.

[reesern1963]

"Somehow, you always seem to feel persecuted, even when the floor is nearly yours alone."

shhhhhhh. Now is the time for a silent, reverent moment. . . . . .


OK. Now to the above I state unequivocally, though it will fall on deadened ears for one or more.

P R O J E C T I O N!


Thus your whining and false claims of "stalking."


Clear Projection.

You won't receive it, but you need to have it stated none the less.

I never said anything about "stalking." I couldn't care less if you post after me every time I post. Perhaps you're confusing me with another poster. You do seem to have a specific dislike for me, which I find something between amusing and appalling. Amusing, because you don't know me at all; appalling, if I cause you so much distress it might be best for you to leave my posts alone, for the sake of your health.

I know you think if you post enough I'll finally, someday, "Come to my senses" and see your point. Too much water under the bridge, there. When you point the finger of projection, don't forget that three fingers point squarely back at you. Your inability to get along and play nice with others spans years. There are many other posters who can back this up. The only poster I have consistently had difficulty with is you. Even Noodle and I, for all the sharp elbows we throw, can on rare occasion agree on an issue. You and I are the only ones who are perpetually at loggerheads. Then again, you are always at war with someone.

Keep lecturing, Professor Edson. You've got an empty classroom.

[reesern1963]

You'll have to choose to disbelieve me , then. I honestly didn't see that insult you referred to. As I said before, I had taken a hiatus from here, so it's possible it happened when I took a break. I don't even know who said it, though I could probably guess.

You don't have to use insulting language to be insulting.

[Edson!]

No I wasn't whining. If you believe otherwise, point it out. And pointing out inequity in moderation and expectations (which is blatantly obvious), is not whining.

The true whiners are the ones who think that an acronym is so offensive that it needs to be removed.

As if they always spoke with respect and dignity about the previous president.

That's the difference, and it's not subtle.

Yep, and then they have the audacity to say that they never complained here about me stalking them when in point of absolute fact it was the farthest thing in the world from reality. Now supposedly the person has forgotten their false accusation against me, referring to me as "stalking them." Yea, OK.
And of course they never put in their CHRONIC little impertinent, completely irrelevant DIGS.

No it's only the four amigos, oops, minus FrankR now, since I guess she has the sense to avoid wasting her time on boards where imbalance in allowed to stand more times that it should. So, gee, I guess it is only the three amigos huh.

I'm not dealing with this utter CRAP anymore reese, p'd, whomever. And reese, I don't care about some lunatic assumptions by you about you coming to your senses. (????) I'm smart enough to know that only God has the most power to influence people's minds and hearts, and even then he will only go so far--just like a parent can only go so far with his or her children, then they must make their own mistakes and live with the consequences.

I point out what I point out and try to base it on substance. Otherwise, I don't waste more than the time it takes for me to type back to you concerned about it. Uhhhh, really. I see it as more of a general problem fo balancing fairness rather than singling folks out and saying it's mostly them, blah, blah, blah.

Wow, you must really believe that people don't have multiple other things to do or be involved with in life. Yes, you must assume people just sit in "ready, set, type-mode" waiting for the next reply on this MB. Really? Are you kidding me?

BTW reese, if my typos bother you b/c I have a lot to say, please just go ahead and be my editor. I usually type for speed not accuracy. Right or wrong, that's my time at this MB. I'll come back later in between things and maybe edit or not. But feel free to present my errors, and I will be more than happy to correct them should I decide I have the time to do so. Otherwise don't bother writing about it, cause it's only another way in which you try to put someone down or THINK you are putting someone in their "PLACE." Get off of it already.

But some folks had better get some memory back before they deny their CLEAR projection and utter hypocrisy as they attack people for idiotic things. You'd better believe those fingers that you are regularly pointing at some of us here are indeed pointing back at you. Coming to your senses on that one? Probably not. It takes something I feel a person must posses in order to be able to admit their fair share in all this stupid back and forth.


Just stick to the freaking discussion points, otherwise please don't address others just for you own facination with all this stupid bickering. I could care less about bickering with you,

which is why I'll again let you have the last word.